Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact torque-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list torque-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 69904 invoked from network); 16 May 2003 13:56:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO funnygarbage.com) (65.242.249.130) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 May 2003 13:56:41 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Oracle BLOB Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 09:56:23 -0400 Message-ID: <794AA7B1BE0DB2458F738486D735394318C73F@mail.funnygarbage.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Oracle BLOB Thread-Index: AcMbLoJhqEwmOUneQIOpYUdMRjMOjAAg0r4A From: "Russell Simpkins" To: "Turbine Torque Users List" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Pavel, What issue are you refering to. Oracle has supported CLOB/BLOB for = quite some time using it's JDBC drivers, though the code was Oracle = specific. For 2 years now I have had no problem inserting megabytes of = BLOB/CLOB data to oracle tables. =20 -----Original Message----- From: Pavel Kusch [mailto:pavel@icecentric.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 6:08 PM To: Turbine Torque Users List Subject: Oracle BLOB Hello, I found this in mailing list about Oracle: Direct support for LOBs in the Thin driver. The Thin driver now provides direct support for BFILEs, BLOBs, and CLOBs. Prior to this release it supported them via calls to PL/SQL routines. http://otn.oracle.com/software/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/htdocs/jdbc_readme9201= .ht ml Has anybody tested if BLOB issue disapeared with the new driver? Thank you. Pavel Kusch --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-user-help@db.apache.org