Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact torque-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list torque-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 41384 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2003 10:16:55 -0000 Received: from tamise.inapg.inra.fr (193.54.111.4) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2003 10:16:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (tamise [127.0.0.1]) by tamise.inapg.inra.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70AF93EB33 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:58:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from inapg.inra.fr (titan3.inapg.inra.fr [193.54.111.13]) by tamise.inapg.inra.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448403EA4F for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:58:20 +0200 (CEST) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Differences between Torque and OJB =?iso-8859-1?q?=3F?= From: MIME-Version: 1.0 To: torque-user@db.apache.org Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:14:20 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 User-Agent: IMHO/0.98.3 (Webmail for Roxen) Message-Id: <20030411095820.448403EA4F@tamise.inapg.inra.fr> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20010714 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, I'm quite new to all these persistence layers, and a bit lost between the different solutions :-). I need *something* that will : - create a DB and associated tables from an XML definition (that is definitely Torque) - make common requests (add/modify/delete) on these tables Concerning the second step, is Torque alone OK, or should I consider using something like OJB ? And why ? (Please Cc: me as I am not on the list) Thank you in advance, Simon -- Simon Vallet Institut National Agronomique de Paris-Grignon svallet@inapg.inra.fr