db-torque-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "REN,ZHANGLING (HP-Boise,ex1)" <zhangling_...@hp.com>
Subject FW: Torque and OJB
Date Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:54:59 GMT
I am using Torque 3.0 to generate all the bean classes for OJB 0.9.9. It
works pretty well. Here are the modified .vm files to include 1:n
associations in the generated bean classes and repository.xml:
  Object.vm in .\torque-3.0\templates\ojb\model directory.
  Control.vm and Repository.vm in \torque-3.0\templates\ojb\repository
directory.

Zhangling Ren

-----Original Message-----
From: Rami Hansenne [mailto:rami.hansenne@pandora.be]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 6:31 AM
To: 'Turbine Torque Users List'
Subject: RE: Torque and OJB


Ok, thanks for your input, Daniel!

So, if I understand correctly, one needs to create all the bean classes
manually in OJB. That's definitely a good argument to use Torque
instead.

Rami.

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel H. F. e Silva [mailto:dhfs@yahoo.com] 
Sent: donderdag 16 januari 2003 12:17
To: Turbine Torque Users List
Subject: Re: Torque and OJB

Hi Rami,

  I had some experiences with both. My opinions are:
  - Torque code generation is a great feature. The architecture used is
very interesting. I think
that for small and medium projects torque is a nice choice.
  - OJB got the power! It has so many features that i can't list them
now. You can use the
low-level implementation, ODMG implementation and JDO implementation.
Its cache implementation is
very good. You can implement, using proxy pattern, lazy loading (what is
a nice catch!). And you
can use all relational aspects from your database with a simple class
hierarchy.
  Of course, these are my opinions. Which one is the best? Depend on
your needings. Both are great
piece of software. And here you have the greatest experts/bps of the
Internet. Enjoy it.

Best regards,
 Daniel.
  



--- Rami Hansenne <rami.hansenne@pandora.be> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Does anyone have experience with both Jakarta Torque and Jakarta OJB?
> I'd like to hear what the differences are and which package is best
used
> in which situation.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Rami.
> 
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 10/01/2003
>  
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:turbine-torque-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:turbine-torque-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:turbine-torque-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:turbine-torque-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 10/01/2003
 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:turbine-torque-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:turbine-torque-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message