Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8F1198DC for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:40:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32058 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2012 13:40:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 32039 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2012 13:40:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 32027 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2012 13:40:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:40:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.24.207.26] (HELO mail.seitenbau.net) (217.24.207.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:40:12 +0000 Received: from www.seitenbau.net ([192.168.15.18]:20737) by mail.seitenbau.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SK8dI-0006SB-1E for torque-dev@db.apache.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:39:48 +0200 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0205.4F8D72A4.00EC,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 Subject: change log: manual or via jira X-KeepSent: E3356277:46711738-C12579E3:004A869C; type=4; name=$KeepSent To: Apache Torque Developers List X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1 September 28, 2009 Message-ID: From: Thomas Fox Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:39:47 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on www/seitenbau(Release 8.5HF467 | May 15, 2009) at 04/17/2012 15:39:47 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org In former releases, we had a change log which was composed manually, e.g. http://db.apache.org/torque/changes-report.html There is also the possibility to let jira create a change log. It looks like this : https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310280&version=12312102 Would you rather have a manually generated change log or point towards the jira change log ? advantages of the manual change log - one can exclude unimportant issues from the change log advantages of the jira change log - less work - less error-prone Personally I'd go for the jira change log. What do you think ? Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org