db-torque-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Vandahl ...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Fwd: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project turbine-core (in module turbine-core) failed
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2011 07:07:22 GMT
On 01.04.11 06:05, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Burn a few goats.

Done. Big stench. Nothing changed. What now? ;-)

> OK, the way Gump works it means Turbine must be built before Torque, so
> we must make torque-generator depend on turbine-core (and obviously
> remove the torque dependencies from turbine-core).  We'll also need to
> check whether any of Turbine's dependencies depend on Torque themselves.
> 
> I'll take care of this.

I'm not a big fan of this solution. Such helper constructs tend to
complicate things and some day nobody will remember what it was meant
for in the first place. There used to be a commons-xxx-2.x dependency in
Gump where some incompatible change had been circumvented. Couldn't we
do the something similar here?

> Secondly this means Torque 3.x will be downloaded from Maven central and
> put into the local repository.  Given that Torque4 seems to be known to
> be incompatible to 3.x (I assume this is intentional) this may be a good

It sure is. What is the general idea of Gump to handle incompatible API
changes?

> thing so I'd live with it (the alternative would be to use a separate
> local repository).

How would the local repository help here? I guess it could help me with
fulcrum-quartz as well.

Bye, Thomas.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message