Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65218 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2010 06:17:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2010 06:17:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 56007 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 06:17:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 55924 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2010 06:17:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 55916 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2010 06:17:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:17:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.92.1.9] (HELO smtp-a.tal.de) (81.92.1.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:17:23 +0000 Received: from mail1.u-form.de (port-87-234-52-160.static.qsc.de [87.234.52.160]) (Authenticated sender: relay@u-form.de) by smtp-a.tal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97AE1070D34 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:17:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.10.1] (port=36241 helo=u-form.local) by mail1.u-form.de with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PC4kM-0007OP-2y for torque-dev@db.apache.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:16:58 +0200 Received: from [10.242.2.6] ([10.242.2.6]) by u-form.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:16:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4CCBB7E2.7010400@u-form.de> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:14:58 +0200 From: Christoph Engelbert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Torque Developers List Subject: Re: created torque 4 branch with village removed References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Oct 2010 06:16:58.0941 (UTC) FILETIME=[0F1EFED0:01CB77FA] Hi Thomas, I'll try to test it against our softwaresystem on one of the testserver next week. I'll give you the results as far as their are available. Christoph Am 29.10.2010 22:24, schrieb Thomas Fox: >> Of course there are a few things left to do (which I will hopefully > tackle >> in the next few weeks): >> - check whether to revive the doPsSelect methods or whether all selects > can >> use prepared statements > Re-added BasePeer.doPSSelect() for now. > >> - there was come code in doDelete which handled cascading deletes (at > leats >> theoretically, never saw it working) tris needs to be reimplemented > Not re-added. The code can definitely not have worked for composite foreign > keys because there is no way to tell a composite foreign key from the > database map. > >> - Maybe one can clean up LargeSelect from the reflection stuff therein > Not while the Peers have static methods. >> ... > So all the open points are closed now. Please give your opinions whether > the solutioon outlined in the trunk-without-village branch is the way to go > for removing village. > > Thanks, > > Thomas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org