Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70474 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2008 08:55:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Dec 2008 08:55:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 89089 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2008 08:56:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 89072 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2008 08:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 89061 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2008 08:56:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:56:00 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:54:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 70411 invoked by uid 1977); 6 Dec 2008 08:55:26 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Dec 2008 08:55:26 -0000 Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:55:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Fischer To: Apache Torque Developers List Subject: Re: status 4.0 svn part In-Reply-To: <49398C22.80109@apache.org> Message-ID: <20081206085209.G68945@minotaur.apache.org> References: <49398C22.80109@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > I'd suggest to copy the village part over as well. It would be easier to > integrate then. I'd like to fix the long-standing blob-NPE with oracle. > Should I do this in the old area or in the new one? For my part, I'd say in the old part. The reasoning is this: We like to get Torque 4 out without village. So why do we need to put more work in ? we can just treat it as external dependency in the torque 4 part. If, on the other hand, we do fixes on 3.3, this should be done in the old 3.3 part. Just my personal opinion, feel free to do it otherwise. Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org