db-torque-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Fischer <fisc...@seitenbau.net>
Subject Re: 3.3-RC3, was: Re: village
Date Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:34:07 GMT
Asking on general@ sounds good to me.

Sorry for not being responsive in the last few months, I have a very
time-conduming project running at work.

   Thomas

Scott Eade <seade@backstagetech.com.au> schrieb am 06.07.2007 01:30:24:

> Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> > How do we proceed here? I wanted to call for a release vote but I would
> > rather sort this out before. Is it possible to use the Village code as
> > it is (2.0, I mean)? Then we could simply wrestle it and check it in.
Or
> > do we have to change the packages and all imports That would be a PITA
> > because at least Record is probably used by most of the Torque
applications.
> I did ask on members@ whether or not it would be okay for us to retain
> the existing package names.  There was a little discussion over whether
> or not we could import this code (which we can) but nobody raised any
> concerns about the package naming (i.e. the question to which I made
> serious efforts to point the discussion towards was ignored and I am
> interpreting this as "there are no serious concerns with this").
>
> Since Torque is the responsibility of the DB PMC I will raise this on
> general@ so that there is an opportunity for objections to be raised
there.
>
> Scott
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message