Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" <torque-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4639F058.8010503@backstagetech.com.au>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 00:23:20 +1000
From: Scott Eade <seade@backstagetech.com.au>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apache Torque Developers List <torque-dev@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Torque 3.3-RC3
References: 
 <OF9D5A3F64.5FCB38CB-ONC12572D0.004D6361-C12572D0.004E09B8@seitenbau.net>
In-Reply-To: 
 <OF9D5A3F64.5FCB38CB-ONC12572D0.004D6361-C12572D0.004E09B8@seitenbau.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thomas Fischer wrote:
> It is not problematic to fix the doDelete()-Problem, this would take about
> half an hour or so. I am still of the opinion that it should be fixed as
> proposed, and could do it on Saturday.
> You said that you would rather like to document the error than fixing it.
> Do you strongly object the fix ?
>
> I have no opinion at all about the texen stuff. As you said, it makes no
> sense to use texen separately if we still use velocity 1.3. Do you think we
> should upgrade to 1.5 ? I recall dimly that some people reported problems
> with velocity 1.4, but I can not recall any details. Are we reasonably
> confident that these problems do not exist in velocity 1.5 any more ?
>   
I think there was some mention of a memory leak somewhere in 1.4 that 
was apparent in the way it was used by torque.

I am pretty sure this will have been addressed in velocity 1.5 - Thomas 
V. can check this with Henning IRL.

I'd like to see us on 1.5 for the sake of consistency.

Scott

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org