Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28819 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2006 09:11:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2006 09:11:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 36659 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2006 09:11:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 36535 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2006 09:11:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 36524 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2006 09:11:57 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:11:57 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of joe.carter@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.173] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:11:45 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so2325895uge for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:11:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=kwYbIBrImJN8clGciP13V0LLMq7pCBEiPjnrChM2IHNYHIP3FzoF+RjX8xl20oupjcqWVHHourdWhjj0Vjn91MvWu202d/1l3kv6grYQI8NB2hKmXz6oYj6Ew1uP0ZO7r2vGIMZKp4tu+oB//ZioiftJQMxY4TKm0RHWgC7p/zc= Received: by 10.78.203.13 with SMTP id a13mr4636895hug.1164964283391; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:11:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.139.2 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 01:11:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <21ca91ec0612010111kdf77dbeg8b9474ffc0c6e02e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:11:23 +0000 From: "Joe Carter" Sender: joe.carter@gmail.com To: "Apache Torque Developers List" , hps@intermeta.de Subject: Re: Torque 4.0 plan In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1853_21060039.1164964283331" References: <21ca91ec0611300258k545f984awa428c5d1229a1c95@mail.gmail.com> <21ca91ec0611301514y683b9867p7b590f4c78d31705@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 309a6dd16d8d9332 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_1853_21060039.1164964283331 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 30/11/06, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > > "Joe Carter" writes: > > >Personally I'd just have the singleton (snip...) > > If you think about a singleton, please separate the singleton class > and the implementation class (don't have the static getInstance() > method and a possible private C'tor in the implementation). If you > separate these, it is possible for projects using e.g. Spring to > manage the classes through the framework. > > Even better, google for 'evil singleton' and read the first few links... > > Best regards > Henning > > I completely agree. Allowing plug-in frameworks to work would be the ideal. Giving me _any_ way to extend was my main concern. I was just a bit wary of asking for too much :-) Cheers Joe ------=_Part_1853_21060039.1164964283331--