Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42022 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 10:19:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 10:19:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 41802 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 10:19:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 41680 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 10:19:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 41669 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2006 10:19:41 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:19:41 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.24.207.26] (HELO mail.seitenbau.net) (217.24.207.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 02:19:15 -0800 Received: from [192.168.15.18] (helo=www.seitenbau.net) by router.seitenbau.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhkWA-0005hB-8N for torque-dev@db.apache.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:18:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <45519ED5.9020304@backstagetech.com.au> Subject: Re: checkstyle configuration To: "Apache Torque Developers List" X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0.1 January 17, 2006 Message-ID: From: Thomas Fischer Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 11:18:48 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on www/seitenbau(Release 7.0.1|January 17, 2006) at 08.11.2006 11:18:49 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Scott Eade schrieb am 08.11.2006 10:09:41: > Thomas Fischer wrote: > > Instead, I'd like to ignore line 4 ,which says > > > > * Copyright 2001-2006 The Apache Software Foundation. > > > > which would allow the copyright year to be different across files, and > > people would not be tempted to change the copyright year in files which > > did not change in any other way. > Actually the header has changed and it no longer includes the copyright > notice. See: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers > > Note also the first FAQ entry: > > All releases created and distributed after November 1, 2006 must > > comply with this policy. > So it looks like this needs to be dealt with before 3.2.1 is cut. Thanks, Scott, I was not aware of this. I'll go and make the necessary changes in the next few days. > While I'm here, why aren't we calling this 3.3? I think 3.2.1 gives the > impression of minor fixes when in actual fact there are tonnes of new > features - IMO 3.3 would be a better way to go. Hm, we went through a lot of trouble to keep this Release compatible to 3.2, and this is indicated by the 3.2.1 release number. In the past, incrementing the minor number indicated that changing the implementation in an existing project needed some reorganisatiuon. This should not be the case in the new release. However, you are right, there are lots of new features. I'm undecided. Any other opinions ? Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org