Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99817 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2006 07:23:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2006 07:23:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 28219 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 07:23:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 28094 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2006 07:23:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 28083 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2006 07:23:14 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:23:13 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.94.251.54] (HELO gate-mail.tewisoft.de) (194.94.251.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:22:59 -0800 Received: from mail.tewisoft.de (pik25.tewisoft.de [192.168.20.18]) by gate-mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA0B9337 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:22:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 3A6E25893D; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:22:38 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on mail.tewisoft.de X-Spam-Level: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1996758767; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:22:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.20.120] (shell10.tewisoft.de [192.168.20.120]) by mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65BD5893D for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 08:22:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <455185B5.7080605@tewisoft.de> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:22:29 +0100 From: Thomas Vandahl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us, cs MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Torque Developers List Subject: Re: checkstyle configuration References: <20061104034146.K84648@minotaur.apache.org> <454EE152.9090605@tewisoft.de> <20061107125301.F37050@minotaur.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20061107125301.F37050@minotaur.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 X-Aloe-Verify: true X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-61.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_20, TEWI98 autolearn=ham version=3.1.4 Thomas Fischer wrote: > What exactly are your worries ? That people do not update the copyright > year when they edit a file ? Ok, I have been neglecting this in the > past, but I promise to behave myself in the future and you can tell me > off if I don't :-) I mean, this line is an important one, legally and such. If you ignore it someone can write something like Copyright 2001-2006 Jack Daniels. into some file and we won't notice (other than by chance). > But something should be done about this in any case. Ignoring line 6 of > the license does not make any sense at all, either we chgange it to line > 4 or we remove it altogether. You are absolutely right with this one. I would remove it and make sure that all license notices are of the same text. Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org