db-torque-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Fischer <fisc...@seitenbau.net>
Subject Version number of new release (was: Re: checkstyle configuration)
Date Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:44:01 GMT

Scott Eade <seade@backstagetech.com.au> schrieb am 08.11.2006 13:44:22:

> Thomas Fischer wrote:
> > Scott Eade <seade@backstagetech.com.au> schrieb am 08.11.2006 10:09:41:
> >
> >> While I'm here, why aren't we calling this 3.3?  I think 3.2.1 gives
the
> >> impression of minor fixes when in actual fact there are tonnes of new
> >> features - IMO 3.3 would be a better way to go.
> >>
> >
> > Hm, we went through a lot of trouble to keep this Release compatible to
> > 3.2, and this is indicated by the 3.2.1 release number. In the past,
> > incrementing the minor number indicated that changing the
implementation in
> > an existing project needed some reorganisatiuon. This should not be the
> > case in the new release.
> > However, you are right, there are lots of new features.
> > I'm undecided. Any other opinions ?
> >
> It is all subjective really.  My interpretation is that 3.3 would be
> compatible with 3.2 but may offer improved functionality.
>
> Now if compatibility was broken by some major enhancement I would be
> suggesting 4.0.
>
> Scott

Both 3.2.1 and 3.3 is fine with me. Calling the release 3.3 is a bit more
work, cause we have to change all the fix versions from 3.2.1 to 3.3 in
jira. I'd sugest a vote alongside the vote about the release.

    Thomas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message