Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16221 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2006 10:47:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2006 10:47:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 7349 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2006 10:48:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 7335 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2006 10:48:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 7324 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2006 10:48:07 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 02:48:07 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 02:47:55 -0800 Received: (qmail 16200 invoked by uid 1977); 29 Oct 2006 10:47:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Oct 2006 10:47:35 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 02:47:35 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Fischer To: torque-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Handling of custom add-ons Message-ID: <20061029021857.T12638@minotaur.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, I'd need some opinions whether we should add custom add-ons to the Torque svn. A short summary of the situation: Greg has submitted a patch to the generator (TORQUE-50) which allows to easily create add-ons to the generator templates. This patch is already in svn and will be in the 3.2.1 version. Now the question is how we should handle such addons. E.g. Greg has submitted an addon which adds support for XML import and export of Torque objects using betwixt. This is certainly a useful feature for some users of Torque. The question is now whether we want to keep such addons in the Apache svn or not. My problems are the following: - A committer must review the code that is commited to the repository. Speaking for me personally, this needs time I would otherwise have used for core Torque code. There are lots of things to do for core Torque code, so I'd rather not spend time for reviewing addons, which can take lot of time: People expect Apache software to be quality software. To ensure this, a careful review is needed, so the a superficial review will not do. - The second concern is the maintainance concern. Users expect Apache software to be maintained. This would mean that someone would have to make sure that an addon still works with newer versions of Torque, and apply changes to that if it doesn't. For the reasons outlined above, I am not prepared to to that. Personally, I belive the better solution would be to host the add-ons externally, e.g in a sourceforge project, and keep links on the Torque page to them. This solution would not have any problems outlined above. I would be happy to maintain links to the externally hosted add-ons on the Torque site. Any other opinions ? Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org