Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23181 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2006 14:45:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2006 14:45:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 51836 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 14:45:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 51817 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 14:45:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 51806 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2006 14:45:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:45:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [217.24.207.26] (HELO mail.seitenbau.net) (217.24.207.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:45:47 -0700 Received: from [192.168.15.18] (helo=www.seitenbau.net) by router.seitenbau.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FqWcZ-0007XK-27 for torque-dev@db.apache.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:45:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <21ca91ec0606140717h2b78205bn77c4c258379f81@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Performance issues when using postgresql-8.1-404.jdbc3.jar To: "Apache Torque Developers List" X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0.1 January 17, 2006 Message-ID: From: Thomas Fischer Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:45:26 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on www/seitenbau(Release 7.0.1|January 17, 2006) at 14.06.2006 04:45:26 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N joe.carter@gmail.com schrieb am 14.06.2006 16:17:44: > I'd read some intention about moving away from Village and the problems with > doing that. > What I might be able to provide is something that starts the process by > handling simple > selects which could revert to village for more complex queries. > No promises though :-) > I should be able to suggest/rule out some approaches at the very least > though. I have already checked the approach to do that some time ago, and doing simple selects without village is not a problem indeed. The real problem is that without village, the behaviour of Torque is likely to change in some subtle way, and some users will have a hard time to make sure that their application still work. So one would like to make the transition in one step, so people have to resolve the issues with that change only one, not with every release. Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org