Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83856 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2006 12:57:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2006 12:57:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 4329 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2006 12:57:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 4317 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2006 12:57:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 4306 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2006 12:57:46 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 04:57:46 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.107.233.227] (HELO e2kmtl1.internal.sungard.corp) (207.107.233.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 04:57:45 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [Vote] migrate from Scarab to jira Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:57:23 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Vote] migrate from Scarab to jira Thread-Index: AcYhp9giSM9Z7ZCNSYaf1KzfDSi5TwABmagg From: To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ ] +1 : Yes, JIRA should be the new bug tracker for Torque [X] 0 : I do not care [ ] -1 : No, Torque should stay with scarab (please give reasons) But why not use Bugzilla? To my knowledge, JIRA is a commercial tool and Bugzilla is free. MG --- The apache infrastructure team has approached us to consider to migrate from scarab to either bugzilla or jira in order to allow the scarab bug tracker to be turned of to save resources on issues.apache.org. As we do not want to interfere with the infrastructure team's work, I'd suggest that we meet their request and migrate to jira. This would probably mean that we would have to migrate the stuff (proposals, patches, open bugs...) we want to keep from scarab manually to the new bug tracker. I'd volunteer to do part of the migration. The vote is open till 1.Feb, 18:00 CET [ ] +1 : Yes, JIRA should be the new bug tracker for Torque [ ] 0 : I do not care [ ] -1 : No, Torque should stay with scarab (please give reasons) Thomas Henri Yandell schrieb am 25.01.2006 06:44:34: > Back at ApacheCon, one of the topics that came up at the Infra meeting > was turning off Scarab. It's only in use by two projects at the ASF > (Jakarta JCS and DB Torque) and uses up valuable resources (ie: admin > + machine resources). Currently it's using 1G of memory on a machine > that's 1G in swap, so you can see how turning it off would smooth > things. > > So we'd appreciate it if you would consider a move to either Bugzilla or JIRA. > > Any thoughts? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org