Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21760 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2006 07:06:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2006 07:06:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 73170 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2006 07:06:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 73144 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2006 07:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 73132 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2006 07:06:01 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:06:01 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [194.94.251.54] (HELO gate-mail.tewisoft.de) (194.94.251.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:06:00 -0800 Received: from mail.tewisoft.de (mail.hq.tewisoft.de [192.168.20.18]) by gate-mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77413F5CD for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:05:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E9A6047E8E; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:05:37 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on mail.tewisoft.de X-Spam-Level: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B4447FB4; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:05:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.20.120] (shell10.tewisoft.de [192.168.20.120]) by mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9559476EB for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:05:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43D72340.6050607@tewisoft.de> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:05:36 +0100 From: Thomas Vandahl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Torque Developers List Subject: Re: proposal for reorganizing the Torque site References: <20060124103952.L57580@minotaur.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20060124103952.L57580@minotaur.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_40, USER_IN_WHITELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thomas Fischer wrote: > Do you think that the old versions are hurting anyone ? I agree that in > most cases, they are of less use than the new docs, but maybe someone > got used to it, or wants to look up an old feature... > > It requires no work at all keeping the old versions. > > Do you still think they should be removed ? My suggestion came from what I feel if I come across a web site like this: "If they were confident that the new version works, they wouldn't keep the old one. So let's stick to the old one. It is probably more stable and I don't want to mess with their bugs..." I just didn't want to confuse the users. Bye, Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org