db-torque-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Thoralf Rickert" <thoralf.rick...@cadooz.de>
Subject AW: Torque with Java5 features
Date Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:49:45 GMT
Okay, now I've 'cheated' the OM templates in Torque 3.2 to enable Java5 features. I've tested
the Peer and Object generation. Everything else is untested (Managers and Beans) but implemented
as good as possible. The templates are currently Java5 enabled. You have to UNSET the "enableJava5Features"
variable. This makes it possible to define a configuration key and make the variable visible,
when the configuration file this says. So I didn't change the Torque Source code (that's maybe
you task).

http://thoralf.log-out.net/tmp/java5enabled-templates.zip

Merry Christmas
Thoralf


> > -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Thoralf Rickert
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 25. November 2005 12:07
> > An: 'Apache Torque Developers List'
> > Betreff: AW: Torque with Java5 features
> > 
> > 
> > > Just to make sure that I understood you correctly: You 
> were able to 
> > > convert the templates without chamnging the Runtime jar, and it 
> > > worked ?
> > 
> > Jo.
> > 
> > > - Testing would be more complicated. At the moment, it is 
> already a 
> > > nuisance to change the databases by hand, and to change 
> the idtable 
> > > property by hand. To not spend my life testing, I do 
> admit I usually 
> > > do not switch other parameters. So this would add another 
> parameter 
> > > to be
> > > switched; this gets to a point where something atomatic would
> > > have to be written.
> > 
> > Just thinking: What about a script that compiles and verifies
> > each possible configuration?
> > 
> > > - We already have too many generator parameters. We need to think 
> > > about that problem. But I would guess in this case, a 
> configuration 
> > > parameter would be the only sensible way (maintaining two sets of 
> > > templates, with managers and withou them, is a nuisance 
> already, I 
> > > would not want another
> > > split)
> > > - In my eyes, it is certainly a nice feature, but it is not
> > > the first in my personal list of priorities for after 3.2. I 
> > > would support it if it would be done, but I would not do 
> it myself.
> > 
> > Because I would chance our torque environment to 3.2 after
> > you've released it, I would also change the templates again 
> > to use them with Java5. So it would be a clear start for me 
> > and no problem to submit it back to you.
> > 
> > But I don't have such a complex test environment. We use only
> > the Object and Peer Templates. So I don't know, if it is 
> > possible to change the Manager to Java5. Do you've a 
> > documentation, which discribes, what you're testing?
> > 
> > bye
> > Thoralf
> > 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message