Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31445 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2005 21:37:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Nov 2005 21:37:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 16388 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2005 21:37:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 16366 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2005 21:37:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 16348 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2005 21:37:12 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:37:11 -0800 Received: (qmail 31222 invoked by uid 1977); 21 Nov 2005 21:36:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Nov 2005 21:36:51 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:36:51 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Fischer To: torque-dev@db.apache.org Subject: retag 3.2-rc3 as 3.2 ? Message-ID: <20051121131456.J21499@minotaur.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, Since the release of 3.2-rc3, there have been some bugs reported. Some of them cocern the support of Derby, and two problems with the jdbc task. However, in my opinion, none of these bugs are significant enough not to release the 3.2-rc3 as the Torque 3.2 final release. The benefits of removing these bugs do not outweigh the benefits of having a final release, which are the following: - we could start fixing bugs which would require changing the behaviour of Torque in some ways, like the village-related bugs - we could also start to have a go at new features such as supporting sql functions or pluggable template extensions And then, a certain frequency of small bugs will always appear, so it will not be feasible to push out a release which is totally free of bugs. With these things in mind, my plan is to call for a vote on retagging 3.2-rc3 as 3.2 in a few days if no significant bugs or obstacles are found until then. So if you want to test the RC before this decision is made, please do so now. Also, if you have any objections against this, we could discuss that before making a decision. Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org