From torque-dev-return-5996-apmail-db-torque-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org Wed Oct 05 07:10:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21868 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2005 07:10:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Oct 2005 07:10:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 44417 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2005 07:10:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 44392 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2005 07:09:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 44381 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2005 07:09:59 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:09:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [194.94.251.54] (HELO gate-mail.tewisoft.de) (194.94.251.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:10:02 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gate-mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33ED8F5CE for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:09:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate-mail.tewisoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (AvMailGate-2.0.1.16) id 06764-34241DBE; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 09:09:43 +0200 Received: from mail.tewisoft.de (mail.hq.tewisoft.de [192.168.20.18]) by gate-mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E06D58D for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:09:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 1301B42266; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135E942284; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:09:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.20.120] (shell10.tewisoft.de [192.168.20.120]) by mail.tewisoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DCE41E42 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:09:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <43437C23.6000107@tewisoft.de> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 09:09:23 +0200 From: Thomas Vandahl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Torque Developers List Subject: Re: 3.2-RC2 not being the final release candidate ? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on mail.tewisoft.de X-Spam-Level: X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.1.16; AVE: 6.32.0.6; VDF: 6.32.0.58; host: mail.tewisoft.de) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_05, USER_IN_WHITELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thomas Fischer wrote: > After the discussion in TRQS322, it seems to me that Torque 3.2-RC2 is not > suitable as the final release, so I will start development towards 3.2-rc3. > If anyone wants a formal vote about it, please shout now. If that is the case, I would like to add some more "cleanup" patches to the templates. I removed some obsolete imports and removed the unused tmpKey variable. There is still some inconsistency in the hierarchy of the generated objects, but I need some hint to get this solved: - According to ExtensionObject.vm, the extended object implements Persistent, which is normally not necessary, because BaseObject already implements Persistent. - According to the generator schema documentation, the base object for the generated classes can be overridden, so that one might not implement Persistent. - However, the BaseXXX classes require most of the Persistent methods If I removed that "implements Persistent" line from ExtensionObject.vm, would that break some scenario I didn't think of? Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org