Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50521 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2005 06:28:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 2005 06:28:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 94545 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2005 06:28:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 94532 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2005 06:28:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 94519 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2005 06:28:21 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 23:28:21 -0700 Received: (qmail 50499 invoked by uid 1977); 12 Sep 2005 06:28:21 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Sep 2005 06:28:21 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 23:28:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Fischer To: torque-dev@db.apache.org Subject: 3.2-RC2 in the next few days ? Message-ID: <20050911231701.H42165@minotaur.apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, Does anyone object to push out RC2 in the next few days ? The other option is doing it in three weeks as afterwards, I am on vacation for two weeks. I am currently aware of the following open issues: JCS. Obviously, the new release wont be in as it is not available. Does it have so much improvements justifying to wait for it ? The LargeSelect limit/offset issue. The developers who have raised a voice are of the opinion that a javadoc statement should suffice, at least for the moment. This would be in. A real solution would have to wait. There was a bug report about functions in offsets to the dev list about two weeks ago. It seems to be an enhancement rather than a bug to me. I have not looked at it, but I will do so before pushing RC2. Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org