From torque-dev-return-5363-apmail-db-torque-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org Mon Jun 13 15:02:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37946 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2005 15:02:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jun 2005 15:02:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 9611 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2005 15:02:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-torque-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 9572 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2005 15:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact torque-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Apache Torque Developers List" Reply-To: "Apache Torque Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list torque-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 9537 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2005 15:02:13 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from web1-glo.biscit.net (HELO web1-glo.biscit.net) (82.195.96.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:02:12 -0700 Received: from bolek.coachhouse (host62-6-124-12.webport.bt.net [62.6.124.12]) by web1-glo.biscit.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id j5DAr5f05429 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:53:06 +0100 Received: (Exim 3.36) #1 (Debian)) protocol: esmtp id 1DhmUk-00076C-00 ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:48:42 +0100 Message-ID: <42AD6488.8020306@numerixtechnology.de> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:48:40 +0100 From: T E Schmitz Reply-To: mailreg@numerixtechnology.de User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Torque Developers List Subject: Re: null connections References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thomas Fischer wrote: > 1) implicitly get a connection and proceed > 2) throw an error > > Personally, I would favour 2). What do you think ? 2 - definitely! I don't think implicit connections are a good idea if one wants an explicit one. -- Regards/Gruß, Tarlika Elisabeth Schmitz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org