db-torque-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Purvis <...@reeltwo.com>
Subject Re: Inheritence question
Date Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:07:14 GMT
Thomas Fischer wrote:
> I am happy to hear this. Of course we are interested in these patches.
> I would guess that the "protected" part of the patch is not problematic to
> implement, and also the foreign key part should be ok.
> In my opinion, it is a good idea to put the base packages into a
> subdirectory. However, I am not so sure about backwards compatibility
> there. Probably one would want to make this configurable (preferably via a
> configurable package suffix)

Yes, we added an "extensionPackage" field for the classes that extend 
the base classes, so our database tag has these fields:

> I do not know how many files you have patched and against which version. If
> there are not too many changed files, I would appreciate it if you create
> an issue in scarab and append the complete files there (please do not diff
> if possible, some velocity templates have changed a bit in the meantime in
> cvs). If you prefer it, you can also mail the files directly to me.

I've made an issue in scarab for this: 
<http://issues.apache.org/scarab/issues/id/TRQS306> with the 4 changed 
files attached.



To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-help@db.apache.org

View raw message