db-torque-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Rall <...@finemaltcoding.com>
Subject Re: TORQUE_3_0_1 CVS Tag
Date Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:00:57 GMT
I briefly stopped watching the commits and am not absolutely certain:
is the tip of TORQUE_3_0_BRANCH in a state where I could throw a
TORQUE_3_0_2 tag on it and call it a release, or is there absolutely
necessary outstanding work that would interfere with normal operation?

- Dan


Martin Poeschl <mpoeschl@marmot.at> writes:

> +1
> 
> martin
> 
> Daniel Rall wrote:
> 
> >Scott Eade <seade@backstagetech.com.au> writes:
> >
> >
> 
> >>Shouldn't the TORQUE_3_0_BRANCH have had a TORQUE_3_0_1
> >>tag added with the release of 3.0.1?
> >>
> >>I guess there is little point if there is not likely to
> >>be a 3.0.2 (i.e. efforts are now focused on 3.1).
> >>
> 
> >
> >What do people think about putting this to get this deadlock fix into
> >a 3.0.2?  I ask because I have seen it fatal to an entire web
> >application.
...

Mime
View raw message