Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23867 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2006 16:21:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2006 16:21:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 45678 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2006 16:21:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 45633 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2006 16:21:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "OJB Developers List" Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 45622 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2006 16:21:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:21:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of tomdzk@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.202 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.202] (HELO nproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.182.202) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:21:48 -0800 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g2so944005nfe for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:21:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WtcDmApi8gM4x9p58oGb/ase2F2FriDAfKQ6NgbtEipxv0YMfuPFdlUoiDMXyKOXbweynVl9dMvaMj/FbBOr3xGa+F3yg3wLOnSHEMzZ9Umq4v/kjbHx7orlWyMqMXldqvfhWsQP7bz5ZydlFschoPHGiu+IfD7ZD3Vv1MqyJWc= Received: by 10.48.218.18 with SMTP id q18mr590548nfg; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:21:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.250.15 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 08:21:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <224f32340601030821l416ec18fma57d847235aa7e0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 17:21:25 +0100 From: Thomas Dudziak To: OJB Developers List , Henri Yandell Subject: Re: Using Ivy ? In-Reply-To: <31cc37360512311709v6f9716c2uce090fa21d0ae9af@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <224f32340512310835j2ed30d1dyc853e780a9a6eb6a@mail.gmail.com> <31cc37360512311709v6f9716c2uce090fa21d0ae9af@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 1/1/06, Henri Yandell wrote: > On 12/31/05, Thomas Dudziak wrote: > > > Now I'm not that much of a Maven guy, and given the troubles that the > > jakarta commons guys had/have, I'd rather avoid Maven 1 (Maven 2 might = be worth checking out though). > > To be fair, the Commons problems are with the multiproject concept in > Maven. Provided you're not trying to be too customised, Maven 1 works > very well for a single project/jar. I didn't want to discredit Maven, but then again OJB does some special things in its build file which probably won't work with pure Maven, and I do not really want to write Maven plugins. > > WDYT, should I try to integrate Ivy into OJB ? > > From what I understand, the Maven 2 Ant libs are a better option. > Someone's blog (ie could be wrong) suggested they would be rolled into > a future version of Ant. My motivation would be that we don't have to put the jars in the repository/source dist, and in the Eclipse classpath file. Will Maven2 be able to do this as well ? regards, Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org