Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12277 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2005 08:05:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2005 08:05:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 45206 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2005 08:05:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 45134 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2005 08:05:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "OJB Developers List" Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 45035 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2005 08:05:41 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of tomdzk@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.197 as permitted sender) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.197) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:05:41 -0700 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so1458238rng for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:05:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=OhJw1qlG48iKouGLQ80ntpjsXtvVtmbi5XJ2H0/pbnCztZUC7WHEIonACq72uFBP81THyImESYudf3atSuoJ9+lcObZqEOUjr2TRyNia+fVPsMtmqUf3L6Xxml9QHLXLCny3592ZZwKf9qHkhkF6Dwzw1l1jW9xfyRoET6yJWvI= Received: by 10.38.90.72 with SMTP id n72mr6233176rnb; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.74.37 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <224f323405041201056327c709@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:05:38 +0200 From: Thomas Dudziak Reply-To: Thomas Dudziak To: OJB Developers List Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (OJB-19) OJB should respect Set/List as the field type for collection descriptors that do not specify a collection class In-Reply-To: <425B767E.20708@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <384211917.1113231856072.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> <425B767E.20708@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > As a side note: Jakob has refactored the implementations in OJB 1.1 -- where this > area is much cleaner and easier to maintain. Yep, but this special case is no different in 1.1, because the RemovalAwareCollection is still the default even when Set is used as the field type. I've changed the handling already, but need to add a RemovalAwareSet which is slightly more work in 1.1 because of the Manageable/Tracking differences. Btw, Martin Taal asked for the introductin of a CollectionFactory which would allow for a nice handling of this. I think I add one to 1.1 this week. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org