db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin Kalén <mka...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [jira] Created: (OJB-19) OJB should respect Set/List as the field type for collection descriptors that do not specify a collection class
Date Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:18:02 GMT
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
>>As a side note: Jakob has refactored the implementations in OJB 1.1 -- where this
>>area is much cleaner and easier to maintain.
> 
> Yep, but this special case is no different in 1.1, because the
> RemovalAwareCollection is still the default even when Set is used as
> the field type.

OK, I thought I remembered that the "skew" default of a List/Vector
had also been reworked but it was a while ago I looked at it.

> Btw, Martin Taal asked for the introductin of a CollectionFactory
> which would allow for a nice handling of this. I think I add one to
> 1.1 this week.

Sounds good!

Regards,
  Martin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message