db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Dudziak <tom...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Created: (OJB-19) OJB should respect Set/List as the field type for collection descriptors that do not specify a collection class
Date Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:05:38 GMT
> As a side note: Jakob has refactored the implementations in OJB 1.1 -- where this
> area is much cleaner and easier to maintain.

Yep, but this special case is no different in 1.1, because the
RemovalAwareCollection is still the default even when Set is used as
the field type. I've changed the handling already, but need to add a
RemovalAwareSet which is slightly more work in 1.1 because of the
Manageable/Tracking differences.
Btw, Martin Taal asked for the introductin of a CollectionFactory
which would allow for a nice handling of this. I think I add one to
1.1 this week.

Tom

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message