Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72975 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2005 00:31:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2005 00:31:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 23629 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2005 00:31:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 23595 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2005 00:31:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "OJB Developers List" Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 23579 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2005 00:31:16 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from manta.curalia.se (HELO manta.curalia.se) (213.115.149.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:31:14 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [80.64.176.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by manta.curalia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1893ABC003 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 01:31:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4227AC49.7050405@apache.org> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:31:05 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin_Kal=E9n?= Organization: ASF User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OJB Developers List Subject: Re: OJB 1.0.2 ? References: <604263CB-4E9C-11D9-A913-000D93C5F5CC@chariotsolutions.com> <12102.1103191880@www39.gmx.net> <41C1CA62.9070301@apache.org> <41C486D1.3090404@gmx.ch> <41C4A3AC.9040404@gmx.ch> <41C4E8A8.4050406@apache.org> <80ECFAAD-5285-11D9-BAFF-000D93C5F5CC@chariotsolutions.com> <979BF90D-5FF4-11D9-9358-000D93C5F5CC@chariotsolutions.com> <224f323405011106404b7e0b7b@mail.gmail.com> <41E3E61E.8030307@apache.org> <41F2C567.1020402@gmx.ch> <421CBB0F.5010705@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <421CBB0F.5010705@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Latest on 1.0.2 and Oracle-testing: All tests now pass on the OJB_1_0_RELEASE-branch with oracle9i-profile, PlatformOracle9iImpl, except for one test in the OTM-suite [1] that is a consistent failure across all platforms. broker/odmg/soda/otm for oracle9i: Tests run: 615, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 163,5 sec Tests run: 129, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 19,562 sec Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3,375 sec Tests run: 79, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 16,11 sec broker/odmg/soda/otm for hsqldb: Tests run: 615, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 77,313 sec Tests run: 129, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 13,875 sec Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 7,469 sec Tests run: 79, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 18,375 sec I say +1 for a release if other platforms pass all but testSwizzle1toN! Since we have started to use proper BLOB and CLOB for BlobTest it would be best to re-test other platforms as well, so that we can adjust the Torque-patch if needed. Regards, Martin [1] It fails because RemovalAwareCollection.clear() has no effect. See: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.ojb.devel/9328 Jakob asked me to check his refactoring of this in OJB1.1, which I have not have time to do yet - I think I'm letting this one pass since it's across all platforms and no regression since 1.0.1 (although a big flaw if RAC should really delete objects on clear?). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org