db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Clute, Andrew" <Andrew.Cl...@osn.state.oh.us>
Subject RE: Feature Proposal: Bytecode generated Proxies
Date Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:45:07 GMT
>From what I can tell at this point, providing a drop-in-replacement for proxies is extremely
doable -- there should be no significant change.  Provided that is the case, I would like
to get a consensus that it would be acceptable to introduce that functional swap in the 1.0.X
line (post 1.0.2). 

Part of my motivation is that I would like to get this introduced into *my* current production
system, and I don't want to deviate to far from official releases of OJB (I have maintained
separate versions a couple of times, but it is a pain).

At the same time, a new proxy system can be introduced into HEAD that incorporates a plug-in
style model. Get the best of both worlds: an immediate scratch to the itch (or is that itch
to a scratch) and a long-term clean, flexible solution.

Assuming this is acceptable, does anyone have comments or suggestions on the changes I proposed
to the metadata to support this?

-Andrew


-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Kalén [mailto:mkalen@apache.org] 
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 2:52 PM
To: OJB Developers List
Subject: Re: Feature Proposal: Bytecode generated Proxies


I agree with Tom that this work is best done in HEAD if it's not a drop-in-replacement for
1.0.2, however it might be a bit of overworking it to provide a pluggable approach in 1.0.x-branch.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message