db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian McCallister <bri...@apache.org>
Subject Re: OJB 1.0.2 ?
Date Fri, 04 Mar 2005 02:15:33 GMT
Postgres has slipped downhill:

     [junit] Tests run: 615, Failures: 7, Errors: 12, Time elapsed: 
211.185 sec
     [junit] Test org.apache.ojb.broker.AllTests FAILED

     [junit] Running org.apache.ojb.odmg.AllTests
     [junit] Tests run: 129, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 26.91 
sec

     [junit] Running org.apache.ojb.soda.AllTests
     [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.406 
sec

     [junit] Running org.apache.ojb.otm.AllTests
     [junit] Tests run: 79, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 18.614 
sec
     [junit] Test org.apache.ojb.otm.AllTests FAILED

I'll see what I can do about it tomorrow.

-Brian

On Mar 3, 2005, at 7:31 PM, Martin Kalén wrote:

> Latest on 1.0.2 and Oracle-testing:
>
> All tests now pass on the OJB_1_0_RELEASE-branch with 
> oracle9i-profile, PlatformOracle9iImpl, except for one test in the 
> OTM-suite [1] that is a consistent failure across all platforms.
>
> broker/odmg/soda/otm for oracle9i:
> Tests run: 615, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 163,5 sec
> Tests run: 129, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 19,562 sec
> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3,375 sec
> Tests run: 79, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 16,11 sec
>
> broker/odmg/soda/otm for hsqldb:
> Tests run: 615, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 77,313 sec
> Tests run: 129, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 13,875 sec
> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 7,469 sec
> Tests run: 79, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 18,375 sec
>
>
> I say +1 for a release if other platforms pass all but testSwizzle1toN!
>
>
> Since we have started to use proper BLOB and CLOB for BlobTest it 
> would be best to re-test other platforms as well, so that we can 
> adjust the Torque-patch if needed.
>
> Regards,
>  Martin
>
> [1] It fails because RemovalAwareCollection.clear() has no effect. See:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.ojb.devel/9328
>
> Jakob asked me to check his refactoring of this in OJB1.1, which I 
> have not have time to do yet - I think I'm letting this one pass since 
> it's across all platforms and no regression since 1.0.1 (although a 
> big flaw if RAC should really delete objects on clear?).
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message