db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Dudziak <to...@first.fhg.de>
Subject Re: Bug in Xdoclet?
Date Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:34:05 GMT
Robert S. Sfeir wrote:

>Shouldn't the column name be required?  How would it know the column name if
>it's not there?
>
>I guess this is where I got tripped, reading so fast I mistook name for
>column name (inattentive move on my part).  Maybe it should be more explicit
>that name, column name and jdbc-types are required, since if I were using
>xdoclet over a getter, the name is not required but the column name is?
>  
>
The column name is never required. If none is given, then the xdoclet 
module uses the name for the column (see description of column attribute 
in ojb.field tag).

>In either case, glad I could help.  Let me know when you have it, I'll test
>and confirm if you'd like.
>  
>
Will check today, I think.

Tom


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message