db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jakob Braeuchi <jbraeu...@gmx.ch>
Subject Re: delete does not include 'ojbConcreteClass' !
Date Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:10:39 GMT
hi armin,

the fix is in cvs now.

jakob

Armin Waibel schrieb:
> With the new class-discriminator PK don't need to be unique across 
> extents anymore - right? So the discriminator field is mandatory for all 
> delete in 1.1?
> 
>  > what do you think about including ojbConcreteClass in the delete
>  > statement ?
> 
> If you don't expect side-effects +1
> 
> Armin
> 
> Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> 
>> hi all,
>>
>> while working on the new class-discriminator stuff (replacement of 
>> ojbConcreteClass) i found that we do not use the field 
>> 'ojbConcreteClass' when deleteing an object, the only attributes used 
>> are the pk.
>>
>> afaik ojbConcreteClass is never part of the pk (at least not in our 
>> samples) so when deleting objects just by pk we could probably delete 
>> more than one row !
>> i know ojb requires the pk to be unique within a class hierarchy, but 
>> if this is not the case, more than one obj is gone...
>>
>> what do you think about including ojbConcreteClass in the delete 
>> statement ?
>>
>> jakob
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message