Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70816 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2004 09:43:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jul 2004 09:43:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 33893 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2004 09:43:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 33867 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2004 09:43:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "OJB Developers List" Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 33853 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2004 09:43:09 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [213.165.64.20] (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 02:43:06 -0700 Received: (qmail 28485 invoked by uid 65534); 10 Jul 2004 09:43:04 -0000 Received: from adsl-62-167-49-159.adslplus.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) (62.167.49.159) by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 10 Jul 2004 11:43:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #15507884 Message-ID: <40EFBA4F.80901@gmx.ch> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:43:43 +0200 From: Jakob Braeuchi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OJB Developers List Subject: mixed mapping (1 table/1 class, 1 table/many) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N hi all, i'm currently working on support for mixed-mapping within a class hierarchy. it's now possible to use 1 table/1 class and 1 table/many classes (ojbConcreteClass) within the class hierarchy. the implementation is still based on adding additional criteria for ojbConcreteClass to a copy of the query, but it's done dynamically when processing all concrete extents. i was also thinking of a query wrapper to transport ojbConcreteClass so i do not have to copy the query and manipulation the criteria. this solution would require some refactoring of the jdbc/sql part of ojb. should i check in this version now ? jakob --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org