Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <40EA6FB9.1070209@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 11:24:09 +0200
From: Armin Waibel <arminw@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: OJB Developers List <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: AutoDirty in PB
References: <9C75E19C-CEF1-11D8-A267-000A95782782@forthillcompany.com>
In-Reply-To: <9C75E19C-CEF1-11D8-A267-000A95782782@forthillcompany.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Brian,

+1, I don't know your implementation in detail, but sounds good to me.
Is it configurable at runtime (enable/disable auto-dirtying)?

Armin

Brian McCallister wrote:
> I have a PersistenceBroker implementation (really just a set of 
> listeners on the regular PB) which handle auto-dirtying at the 
> persistence broker level via copy-on-read and compare-on-commit.
> 
> It is less functional than the OTM in that it doesn't handle isolation 
> etc, just performs its behavior at the PB level. This is identical 
> behavior to the Hibernate Session, which a lot of people seem to like, 
> so I was wondering, now that 1.0 is out, if there was any interest in 
> making this available in the OJB directly, or simply work on the OTM 
> level. Advantage is that it is more performant and much less code than OTM.
> 
> -Brian
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org