Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18335 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2004 18:19:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 18:19:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 27795 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2004 18:19:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 27714 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2004 18:19:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "OJB Developers List" Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 96236 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2004 11:14:59 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: ojb-dev@db.apache.org To: ojb-dev@db.apache.org Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BDB_OJB_Wiki=5D_New=3A__OJBNextSteps?= Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:14:56 -0000 Message-ID: <20040702111456.1013.51382@minotaur.apache.org> X-Spam-Rating: localhost.hyperreal.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Date: 2004-07-02T04:14:55 Editor: 217.231.139.226 <> Wiki: DB OJB Wiki Page: OJBNextSteps URL: http://wiki.apache.org/db-ojb/OJBNextSteps Restructured into sections for 1.0.1 / 1.0.x / 1.1 / 1.x New Page: =3D Goals for OJB 1.0.1 =3D * fix unit tests failures for '''all''' databases that are supported by OJB * cleanup/update of documentation as necessary (e.g. Deployment) * completion of javadoc (incl. constants, parameters, return values, excep= tions) for at least the public/protected API parts =3D Goals for OJB 1.0.x =3D * creation and manipulation of databases with classes and ant tasks, based= on commons-sql -- DatabaseManipulation ''[tomdz] IMO important enough to warrant introduction in 1.0.x'' =3D Goals for OJB 1.1 =3D * I think "native" JDO support should be in it -- ["JDOSupport"] * support for McKoi and AxisDB databases -- SupportedDatabases * Better support for all kind of Java Collections and Maps. -- Collections= AndMaps * support a real mapping of one class to multiple tables. -- OneClassMulti= pleTables * some restructuring would be nice ... e.g. move the reversedb stuff to it= 's own src dir and jar -- ["OJBTools"] * use jakarta-commons packages (e.g. logging and configuration) -- UseComm= ons ''[tomdz] Esp. logging should replace the current logging handling of OJ= B; also commons-collections could be useful'' * support for the complete ODMG 3 query language (OQL) as defined in their= grammar -- ["OQLComplete"] Application Management * support for jmx based run time management of broker management extc. =3D Goals for OJB 1.x =3D * support for generics (Java 1.5) -- JavaGenerics =3D Unassigned goals =3D * out-of-the-box support for storing primitive types. -- PrimitiveTypes ''[tomdz]: What is meant by that ?'' * completing the Prevayler based PB implementation. -- PrevaylerBroker * clear separation of API and SPI parts. In the ATM we this already, havin= g it in the other layers as well ease the maintenance process, as OJB devel= opers we'll immediately see which parts can be changed without changing par= ts of the API. -- ApiSpiSeparation * full support mixing of mapping strategies. -- MixingMappingStrategies = * i'm playing with oracle spatial at the moment ... not sure if there is a= way to support stuff like this .. but it would be nice ;-) -- OracleSpatial * I [thma] vote for removing support for the S.O.D.A query API (http://sod= aquery.sourceforge.net/docs/index.html). I think we should focus on the sta= ndards like JDO and ODMG that have found some acceptance in the market. ''There are a large number of features proposed for the 1.1 release, it rea= ds more like a wish list than feature list :) Why not schedule a number of = releases 1.1, 1.2, 1.n, 1.n+ that deliver features based on priority??? I'm= sure more users out there care about a JDO implementation than some other = features especially now that JD02 is on the way. Besides its much easier to= make many smaller releases than a few large ones and should improve the cr= edibility of this fine project. --AndyHull'' --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org