db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian McCallister <mccallis...@forthillcompany.com>
Subject Re: ojb 1.1 ideas and proposals
Date Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:13:35 GMT
True, true. I was thinking that it was going to just use java 
inheritance to establish things.

Misunderstood you =-)

-Brian

On Jul 12, 2004, at 8:59 AM, Thomas Dudziak wrote:

> Brian McCallister wrote:
>
>>> Could you explore that some more ? Where are we losing flexibility ?
>>
>>
>> Right now you can add some convenient tag interfaces for querying 
>> purposes -- segment the candidate list in the object model etc. I 
>> doubt many people actually do this, however. Thomas M. explained this 
>> to me once when I didn't grok the extent stuff.
>
>
> Hmm, I thought extend is the same as extent, but rather than 
> specifying the subtypes at the basetypes you specify the basetypes at 
> the subtypes. These tag interfaces should then still be possible, or 
> not ?
>
> Tom
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message