db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert S. Sfeir" <rob...@codepuccino.com>
Subject Re: Forward!
Date Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:08:34 GMT
heh, which is why I was saying that define the goals based on the 
release cycle, not the release cycle based on the goals.  So if we 
think it might be too much for a timeframe, then reduce the goals.  :-)

R

On Jul 2, 2004, at 7:01 AM, Thomas Dudziak wrote:

> Robert S. Sfeir wrote:
>
>> Oh yeah, and I think 6-8 weeks for a 1.0.1 is too slow, way too slow. 
>>  The problem is that we've gained a reputation of having slowed down 
>> to a crawl, and that's not good.  We can certainly do Doc and java 
>> doc.  we've just added 2 people to comitters (me and Martin), I know 
>> I would be more than willing to work on Doc and java doc.
>
> I think 6 weeks is realistic, but if we can manage earlier, all the 
> better. But IMO its better to define clear goals for 1.0.1, and then 
> fulfill them. And if it takes only one week, great, but if only 6 
> weeks, I don't mind as long as the new version is better for the users 
> than the old . And a new release just two weeks after the initial 1.0 
> sounds like a classical 'serious bug fixed' release for which the PC 
> Gaming Industry is so famous.
>
> Btw, I'll 'refactor' the OJBOnePointOne wiki page so we can use it for 
> this.
>
> Tom
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message