db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Dudziak <to...@first.gmd.de>
Subject Re: [vote] Speaking of 1.0
Date Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:57:28 GMT
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Brian McCallister wrote:

> These open items are all doc related, I vote for pushing a minor 
> doc-fix release when they are done. i am working on docs, but they 
> shouldn't hold us up for 1.0. I'll start a new vote thread.

We could split the binary distribution of OJB for the final:

* OJB only (no external libraries)
* OJB with all dependencies (except jdo and j2ee)
* OJB-docs (generated forrest documentation (no pdf) which can simply be
unpacked into one of the above dists)

This way, the downloads will be smaller, and the problem with the
documentation generation is solved as well. The source should be left
unchanged and without pre-made documentation, I think.

> >>> - After migration to Forrest [db-ojb]/xdocs is outdated - Remove it?
> >>> Any missed files in new Forrest xdocs?
> >>>
> >
> > think we can remove the maven xdocs

+1 (including the build targets)

> >>> - Problem local documentation. The ant targets 'htmldoc' and 'xslt'
> >>> don't work with new forrest-xdoc files. Should we include Forrest
> >>> generated doc in Source and Binaries OJB versions? I think so,
> >>> otherwise user need to install Forrest to generate the doc or only 
> >>> can  read docs online.

See above: we should provide generated documentation in an additional
archive; and these two targets should be removed from the build
file. Also, the 'forrest' target could be renamed to 'doc' and the output
be placed in an better place (new top-level directory doc ?).


To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org

View raw message