db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert S. Sfeir" <rob...@codepuccino.com>
Subject Re: PersistentField implementations, dramatic performance differences
Date Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:40:59 GMT
And boy would I ever use that :-)  Speed speed speed!

R


On 6/25/04 12:28 PM, "Thomas Dudziak" <tomdz@first.fhg.de> wrote:

> Armin Waibel wrote:
> 
>> I currently rework my new implementations. But I would prefer to check
>> in this stuff (remember my hard disk crash ;-)). We can let these
>> classes undocumented and free to try till 1.0.1.
> 
> You're right, it makes sense to add them now (as
> PersistentFieldDirectAccessImplNew or something), and by putting a note
> into the release notes (e.g. that there is a new persistenfield impl
> which is faster but less well-tested) and into OJB.properties a user can
> check for himself.
> 
> Tom
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message