db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Armin Waibel <arm...@apache.org>
Subject Re: PersistentField implementations, dramatic performance differences
Date Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:33 GMT
Robert, Jakob,

you persuade me to enable the new PFDirectAccessImplNew as default 
PersistentField (made some more checks and think it's really stable). I 
add a notice to release-notes and OJB.properties file.

Armin

Robert S. Sfeir wrote:
> FWIW, all tests pass with new impls on Postgresql, with the exception of the
> normal errors I get due to missing data in the DB because of the double
> field.
> 
> I wonder what the hurt would be to enable these new impls by default and
> document that they're enabled, and let users know that if they hit problems,
> the workaround is to 1) file a bug letting us know what the problem is, and
> 2) reverting to old impl with instructions on how to do that.
> 
> R
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message