db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Armin Waibel <arm...@apache.org>
Subject Re: PersistentField implementations, dramatic performance differences
Date Sat, 26 Jun 2004 09:41:52 GMT
Thomas Dudziak wrote:

> 
> But as the doc for currentTimeMillis() states, this is not a bug in the 
> JDK but depends on the machine used:
> 
> "Returns the current time in milliseconds. Note that while the unit of 
> time of the return value is a millisecond, the granularity of the value 
> depends on the underlying operating system and may be larger. For 
> example, many operating systems measure time in units of tens of 
> milliseconds."
>

doh! I'd better should read javadoc before talk nonsense.

Armin


>> I added a test case for PersistenceFields (PersistenceFieldTest), it 
>> seems that PersistenceFieldAutoProxyImpl isn't work properly. The test 
>> does not pass.
>> The test use non-nested, nested fields and fields specific to 
>> Introspector (metadata name is compilant with javabeans, but class 
>> field name differs).
> 
> 
> I'll check that.
> 
> Tom
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message