db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jakob Bräuchi" <jbraeu...@gmx.ch>
Subject Re: commons-collection 3.0
Date Thu, 03 Jun 2004 06:09:47 GMT
hi all,

> On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Brian McCallister wrote:
> > 
> > > I use 3.0 locally, works great form what i can tell.
> > > 
> > > -Brian
> > > 
> > > On Jun 2, 2004, at 3:57 PM, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> > > 
> > > > hi all,
> > > >
> > > > is there a reason why we still use the old commons-collection 2.0 ?
> > 
> > Just out of curiosity (and I'm sure this has been asked before): what
> are
> > we using commons-collections for within OJB (aside from XDoclet which
> uses
> > AFAIK) ?
> 
> There seems to be only one place in OJB that uses commons-collections
> anyway, and that's in the xdoclet module (and I can replace this usage),
> so why not removing this dependency altogether ?

they have many useful things like ordered sets. imo ojb would benefit from
replacing some 'hand coded' stuff with commons-collections. 
 
jakob

> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 

-- 
"Sie haben neue Mails!" - Die GMX Toolbar informiert Sie beim Surfen!
Jetzt aktivieren unter http://www.gmx.net/info


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message