db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian McCallister <mccallis...@forthillcompany.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Speaking of 1.0
Date Thu, 06 May 2004 01:58:32 GMT

On May 5, 2004, at 8:26 PM, Armin Waibel wrote:
> Never got any comments on this questions:
>
> - Check documentation, check for outdated stuff?
> OJB start site needs a "facelift". Check "getting started" and
> tutorials - any missing hints?

Will do.

>
> - Which tutorial classes/packages are valid, which one are outdate?
> tutorial1, tutorial2 are outdated I think (but I'm not sure) -
> remove?. What about tutorial5 directory (contains only a single class)?
>
> - After migration to Forrest [db-ojb]/xdocs is outdated - Remove it?
> Any missed files in new Forrest xdocs?

I'll double check that everything made it to forrest and remove old  
stuff.

>
> - Problem local documentation. The ant targets 'htmldoc' and 'xslt'
> don't work with new forrest-xdoc files. Should we include Forrest
> generated doc in Source and Binaries OJB versions? I think so,
> otherwise user need to install Forrest to generate the doc or only can  
> read docs online.

Yes! Include them, most definitely. You want to add these to the build?

>
> regards,
> Armin
>
>> jakob
>> Armin Waibel wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Brian McCallister wrote:
>>>
>>>> Let's release a final RC and if no *major* bugs reported in a  
>>>> week's time relabel it to 1.0!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Generally speaking I agree, but before this we should cleanup the  
>>> CVS trunk:
>>>
>>> - Check for used outdated/duplicated classes
>>> My last CVS commit move a package from odmg to kernel to avoid  
>>> duplicated code
>>>
>>> - Separate the tools stuff from src/java to src/tools
>>> Started working on that, check in tomorrow
>>>
>>> - Check documentation, check for outdated stuff?
>>> OJB start site needs a "facelift". Check "gettting started" and  
>>> tutorials - any missing hints?
>>>
>>> - Which tutorial classes are valid, which one are outdate?
>>> tutorial1, tutorial2 are outdated I think (but I'm not sure) -  
>>> remove?. What about tutorial5 directory (contains only a single  
>>> class)?
>>>
>>> - After migration to Forrest [db-ojb]/xdocs is outdated and should  
>>> be removed.
>>>
>>> - Problem local documentation. The ant targets 'htmldoc' and 'xslt'  
>>> don't work with new forrest-xdoc files. Should we include Forrest  
>>> generated doc in Source and Binaries OJB versions? I think so,  
>>> otherwise user need to install Forrest to generate the doc.
>>>
>>> After finalize these peanuts I fully agree with Brian ;-)
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Armin
>>>
>>>
>>>> [] + 1 Finally!
>>>> [] +0 Sounds good, but I am not convinced
>>>> [] -0 Sounds bad, but I am not convinced
>>>> [] -1 It's not ready yet
>>>>
>>>> -Brian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>> -
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message