db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "J.Braeuchi" <jbraeu...@gmx.ch>
Subject Re: [vote] commons-logging
Date Sun, 30 May 2004 21:07:22 GMT

there are some other methods prefixed by safe* that need some attention.


Thomas Dudziak wrote:

>I'd like to start a vote as to whether OJB should migrate to
>commons-logging for its logging purposes. IMO this is beneficial as it
>adds value (pluggable logging, separation of logging settings and OJB
>configuration) at the relatively small cost of 1 additional dependency
>to a 30k library (which is already part of the dist).
>Antonio Gallardo expressed concerns that this might lead to problems:
>but IMO these problems do not apply to OJB:
>* we're already using static classes in logging (so two apps with a shared
>classloader will use the same logging setup) - commons-logging is no
>* even though commons-logging uses classloader magic to determine which
>logging implementation to use, this can be turned off using a service
>declarator in the manifest, or with a specific system property
>The actual migration is not much work: for most classes, it means a simple
>change to the imports (importing commons-logging instead of the logging
>classes of OJB).
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org

To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org

View raw message