db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heini...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: [OTM] bug with most simple use case - the story goes on :)
Date Fri, 14 May 2004 22:44:52 GMT
On 14.05.2004 00:30, Oleg Nitz wrote:

> Hi Jeorg,
> 
> Sorry for doing nothing about OTM problems last time, I'll try to start doing 
> more.

No problem. I made it work for me doing the two iterations in two 
transactions, though this can obviously lead to data loss.

I only found it strange that there was no reaction at all.

>>BTW, did this test case made it into the CVS? I searched it, but could not
>>find it.
> 
> It's here: SwizzleTests.testSomethingSimple()
> Can you give me the diff, please?

Oh, don't know why I did not find it. The test diff is extremely easy.

Joerg


Index: SwizzleTests.java
===================================================================
RCS file: 
/home/cvspublic/db-ojb/src/test/org/apache/ojb/otm/SwizzleTests.java,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -r1.13 SwizzleTests.java
--- SwizzleTests.java	12 Apr 2004 16:32:42 -0000	1.13
+++ SwizzleTests.java	14 May 2004 22:41:26 -0000
@@ -475,6 +475,8 @@
          addresses = this.updateAddresses(addresses);
          addresses = this.getAddresses();

+        assertEquals("Collection of addresses must be 1. ", 1, 
addresses.size());
+
          iter = addresses.iterator();
          while (iter.hasNext()) {
              Address address = (Address)iter.next();

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message