Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35028 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2004 06:26:28 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 06:26:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 11169 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2004 06:25:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-ojb-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 11139 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2004 06:25:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "OJB Developers List" Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list ojb-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 11067 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2004 06:25:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.web.de) (217.72.192.226) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 06:25:58 -0000 Received: from p509026a9.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.144.38.169] helo=web.de) by smtp.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (WEB.DE 4.101 #91) id 1BJ4zp-0003Qs-00 for ojb-dev@db.apache.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:26:09 +0200 Message-ID: <40909FCB.7050409@web.de> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:25:15 +0200 From: Thomas Mahler Reply-To: thma@apache.org Organization: Apache Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030821 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OJB Developers List Subject: Re: [New website] Migration to Forrest is done References: <408FD472.7020006@apache.org> <408FDD22.9080107@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <408FDD22.9080107@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: thma32@web.de X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi all, I like the krysalis style most, as it has a very tidy and elegant look and feel. I don't have any layout problems with it either on XP or Linux. But maybe that's because I'm running 1280x1024 and higher resolutions. There is a smaller sized OJB logos in cvs (/xdocs/images/ojb-200.png). Maybe it's worth a try. If required I can produce OJB logos of different sizes. just tell me the maximum width and height. cheers, thomas Armin Waibel wrote: > Hi, > > now the OJB preview site is with three different skins online > > - forrest-skin > - krysalis-skin > - tigris-skin > > I think none is prefect (we really need a web-designer ;-)) > But only krysalis-skin seems to overhang on right margin. > > regards, > Armin > > > Armin Waibel wrote: > >> Thomas Dudziak wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Armin Waibel wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi Brian, >>>> >>>> Brian McCallister wrote: >>>> >>>> I saw your screenshots, but I can't figure out what's the problem? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The left 'frame' overlaps with the content part. >> >> >> >> doh! Think I should renew my eyeglasses ;-) >> >>> I also had a problem with Mozilla (1.6) on WinXP, as the containing >>> the 'Published:' part is actually somewhat wider than the rest >>> of the page (everything right of the 'Published: V' hangs over). >>> >> >> I think it because the logo images are too wide. The db-apache loge >> has 520px and OJB has 400px. Does anyone knows a better (smaller) >> apache db-logo image? >> >>> BTW, did you try the other styles ? >> >> >> >> yep, with forrest style the side hands over too. >> >>> Me personally, I like the original >>> Forrest style or the style that Axis uses, better, but that's just my >>> opinion ;-) >>> >> >> Personally I prefer krysalis style, but axis looks fine too. >> We need a web-designer to create an OJB style ;-) >> >> >> ... >> >>> >>> >>> Is JavaDoc aware of these tags (todo, version etc.)? If yes, then we >>> might >>> get away with a simple doclet for JavaDoc which generates these files ? >>> If not, then I could write a simple XDoclet module that does this. >>> >> >> hmm, it would be helpful, but do we need this? I think in most cases >> our todo entries something like "implement native JDO-API" or >> something similar. If we auto-generate all todo's we will end with >> many, many entries and most of them will never be fixed ;-) >> >> regards, >> Armin >> >>> Tom >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org