Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
From: "Oleg Nitz" <on@ukr.net>
To: "OJB Developers List" <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: OTM and ManagedCollections
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C7FDA574-77B9-11D8-978A-000A95782782@forthillcompany.com>
Reply-To: "Oleg Nitz" <on@ukr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-u
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E1B3Z9q-000Bld-00@fatlady.ukr.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:24:22 +0200

Hi Brian,

You are right, OTM is "Collection-based". I don't remember exactly why did I do so, probably because ManageableCollection interface is not rich enough for some OTM features like swizzling, but now I am not ready to point at the concrete place in the code. So, you may start hacking, but be aware of possible problems of the kind that I mentioned above.

Regards,
 Oleg

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian McCallister <mccallister@forthillcompany.com>
To: OJB Developers List <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:21:21 -0500
Subject: OTM and ManagedCollections

> Anyone know a way to get a non Collection implementing class accepted 
> by the OTM? It implements ManagedCollection, but the OTM seems to cast 
> to Collection a lot.
> 
> Before I start hacking the OTM to work like the PB in this regard I 
> figured I should ask =)
> 
> -Brian
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 
> 


-----
�������� ���������� �������� ���� �� http://www.freemail.ukr.net
    

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org