db-ojb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jakob Braeuchi <jbraeu...@gmx.ch>
Subject Re: OTM and Report Queries
Date Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:09:43 GMT
hi brian,

this would imply that we know the identity of the retrieved objects which is not 
the case in the current implementation. an even bigger issue would be to modify 
joined results.

jakob

Brian McCallister wrote:

> I know, was thinking about possibility of doing it as projection from  
> live objects =) If it would even be worth the effort is another matter.
> 
> -Brian
> 
> On Mar 24, 2004, at 1:04 PM, Jakob Braeuchi wrote:
> 
>> hi brian,
>>
>> report queries are a imo read-only thing.
>> the result of a report-query is a collection of object-arrays not 
>> real  business-objects.
>>
>> jakob
>>
>> Brian McCallister wrote:
>>
>>> I am all for supporting it, but make sure the semantics around it 
>>> are  clear -- are these transactional bound reports, can you 
>>> manipulate  values and have them reflected back into objects 
>>> (actually, that  would be interesting, report query as projection of 
>>> object model); or  is it simply a snapshot report?
>>> -Brian
>>> On Mar 23, 2004, at 6:45 PM, Oleg Nitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> I still think that the method for creating report queries via OTM  
>>>> interface
>>>> may be convenient. Can anybody say "Yes" to this? :))))
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday 24 March 2004 01:33, Brian McCallister wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't personally care about the ability to do it, just trying to  
>>>>> push
>>>>> around the edges to see what is in and our of the OTM's scope. If
>>>>> reports are outside scope, that is fine by me =) Just confirming  that
>>>>> it is on purpose.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Brian
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 23, 2004, at 5:38 PM, Oleg Nitz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday 20 March 2004 20:54, Brian McCallister wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are we supposed to be able to do report queries from the OTM?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't see much sense in this: what object transaction things 

>>>>>> should
>>>>>> OTM do
>>>>>> for report queries?
>>>>>> I will add such method to API if you think this would be  convinient.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oleg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------

>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org


Mime
View raw message