Mailing-List: contact ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "OJB Developers List" <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <4041B41E.4020609@gmx.ch>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:42:54 +0100
From: Jakob Braeuchi <jbraeuchi@gmx.ch>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: OJB Developers List <ojb-dev@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Should be RC6
References: <40411C36.7030009@codepuccino.com>
In-Reply-To: <40411C36.7030009@codepuccino.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

hi robert,

i've done lots of minor changes detected by findbugs and added keyword expansion 
(-kkv) to a lot of files. imo we should deliver 1.0 pretty soon. yet another rc6 
will only defer the problem of assembling 1.0 and we'll end up with rc7 etc.
afaik there's also a 'licence deadline'...

just my 0.02 chf
jakob


Robert S. Sfeir wrote:
> I know as much as everyone wants to go 1.0, don't you think with all the 
> changes made in the last 3-4 days (some 355 files changed from my last 
> update from 2 weeks ago) that you ought to put out RC6, and not 1.0?  
> Some of the changes looked pretty major, even if they were bug fixes, 
> and you owe it to the users out there to take one more look at it before 
> you spit out 1.0.
> 
> JMHO.
> 
> I tried to do a full update just now, and tried to run all JUnit tests 
> and a few of the ODMG tests don't pass.  I'm not entirely sure what it 
> is yet, but it's in CollectionProxy tests.
> 
> Thanks for all the hard work!
> 
> R
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-dev-help@db.apache.org